You are not logged in.
Hi
Doing a full system upgrade reports this error:
[user@mypc ~]$ LC_ALL=C sudo pacman -Syu
[sudo] password for user:
:: Synchronizing package databases...
core 154.4 KiB 498 KiB/s 00:00 [###########################################] 100%
extra 1908.3 KiB 2.30 MiB/s 00:01 [###########################################] 100%
community 4.9 MiB 2.57 MiB/s 00:02 [###########################################] 100%
:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies...
looking for conflicting packages...
error: unresolvable package conflicts detected
error: failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies)
:: python2-pyqtwebengine and pyqtwebengine-common are in conflict
[user@mypc ~]$This happens since 2 weeks ago more or less.
Someone knows how solve this issue?
Thanks in advance.
Last edited by archlinux32forever (2020-01-18 11:48:17)
Offline
I don't quite understand that error. Does it mean that both those package advertise that they provide the same string, or that they deposit the same files on disc or something else? Each case seems to require some more information to actually resolve, so it seems you need to do some more debugging.
Maybe pacman -Qi on both of those packages and reporting back will shine a light.
Architecture: pentium4, Testing repos: Yes, Hardware: EeePC 901+2GB RAM+OS half on the SD card.
Offline
This is the output from pacman -Qi from both packages:
[user@mypc ~]$ LC_ALL=C pacman -Qi python2-pyqtwebengine
Name : python2-pyqtwebengine
Version : 5.13.2-1.0
Description : Python 2 bindings for QtWebEngine
Architecture : pentium4
URL : https://www.riverbankcomputing.com/software/pyqtwebengine/intro
Licenses : GPL
Groups : None
Provides : None
Depends On : python2-pyqt5 pyqtwebengine-common
Optional Deps : None
Required By : calibre
Optional For : None
Conflicts With : None
Replaces : None
Installed Size : 535.72 KiB
Packager : Erich Eckner <arch32 at eckner dot net>
Build Date : Tue Nov 5 12:38:44 2019
Install Date : Mon Dec 9 13:17:19 2019
Install Reason : Installed as a dependency for another package
Install Script : No
Validated By : Signature
[user@mypc ~]$ [user@mypc ~]$ LC_ALL=C pacman -Qi pyqtwebengine-common
Name : pyqtwebengine-common
Version : 5.13.2-1.0
Description : Common files shared between python-pyqtwebengine and python2-pyqtwebengine
Architecture : pentium4
URL : https://www.riverbankcomputing.com/software/pyqtwebengine/intro
Licenses : GPL
Groups : None
Provides : None
Depends On : qt5-webengine
Optional Deps : None
Required By : python2-pyqtwebengine
Optional For : None
Conflicts With : None
Replaces : None
Installed Size : 147.71 KiB
Packager : Erich Eckner <arch32 at eckner dot net>
Build Date : Tue Nov 5 12:38:44 2019
Install Date : Mon Dec 9 13:17:18 2019
Install Reason : Installed as a dependency for another package
Install Script : No
Validated By : Signature
[user@mypc ~]$ Offline
Okay, neither explictly provide any more than their package names, so it can't be my first assumption. But it looks like their might be common files since the first depends on the second, yet the second says it contains the intersection of common files between the python2 and python3 versions of the first lib. Could you do a pacman -Ql (lower case L) on both to prove that that's the problem being reported, please?
Architecture: pentium4, Testing repos: Yes, Hardware: EeePC 901+2GB RAM+OS half on the SD card.
Offline
someone pulls in pyqtwebengine-common which conflicts both packages.
Check what you need to remove in order to remove that package - python2-pyqtwebengine should be amongst them. Then you can upgrade. Or do you happen to try a partial upgrade here?
regards,
deep42thought
Offline
Ah yes, if I do a pacman -Si on python2-pyqtwebengine on my system, it tells me it conflicts with pyqtwebengine-common. Seems like you'll have to remove calibre before you can update, then hopefully you can add it back if you still need it.
Architecture: pentium4, Testing repos: Yes, Hardware: EeePC 901+2GB RAM+OS half on the SD card.
Offline
I uninstalled calibre with his dependences with
$ sudo pacman -Rs calibreAnd when I try a full system upgrade I get this error:
[user@mypc ~]$ LC_ALL=C sudo pacman -Syu
[sudo] password for user:
:: Synchronizing package databases...
core is up to date
extra is up to date
community is up to date
:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies...
looking for conflicting packages...
:: python-pyqt5 and pyqt5-common are in conflict. Remove pyqt5-common? [y/N]
error: unresolvable package conflicts detected
error: failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies)
:: python-pyqt5 and pyqt5-common are in conflict
[user@mypc ~]$ And if I choose Yes I get another error
[user@mypc ~]$ LC_ALL=C sudo pacman -Syu
:: Synchronizing package databases...
core is up to date
extra is up to date
community is up to date
:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies...
looking for conflicting packages...
:: python-pyqt5 and pyqt5-common are in conflict. Remove pyqt5-common? [y/N] Y
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: installing xorgproto (2019.2-2.0) breaks dependency 'xf86dgaproto' required by libxxf86dga
[user@mypc ~]$ Offline
Yes, I think I have that latter error at the moment. I think I saw that someone in these parts already resolved it, but I haven't yet found it, or figured out my own solution.
So I think you've fixed the title problem, and are with the rest of us again.
Architecture: pentium4, Testing repos: Yes, Hardware: EeePC 901+2GB RAM+OS half on the SD card.
Offline
can you remove pyqt5-common, too?
pacman -Rs pyqt5-commonMake sure to not remove something important, though (or to re-install it afterwards).
regards,
deep42thought
Offline
He effectively did that when he said yes to pacman asking if it could be removed. Then he hit the same error I get when I've recently tried to update.
In regards to that, trying to remove libxxf86dga tells me it can't becuase mplayer depends on it.
Ah, just figured out what I was doing wrong, I was calling -Si on pacman, which was effectively giving me the dependencies of the latest version on the server, which *doesn't* depend on libxxf86dga for good reason, but if I do a -Qi as I probably intended, it does tell me. I'll have to wait until I finish my current playlist in mplayer before I can try fixing that - perhaps a partial upgrade of mplayer then the removal of libxxf86dga (if it didn't get removed by upgrading mplayer), followed by a system upgrade might be the neatest way to fix this.
Edit: Nope, doing a partial upgrade doesn't remove any orphaned packages, as far as the man pages would elucidate, So I removed mplayer using pacman -Rs then reinstalled it as part of a system upgrade. This has passed the conflict check and is running now, so I think that's the trick.
Last edited by levi (2020-01-16 07:47:34)
Architecture: pentium4, Testing repos: Yes, Hardware: EeePC 901+2GB RAM+OS half on the SD card.
Offline
Thanks a lot!
At end I could do a system upgrade.
I remove mplayer with your instructions
$ sudo pacman -Rs mplayerand selected to remove pyqt5-common and the system upgrade ended correctly. The only problem that I had is that randomly the wifi connection fails (I don't know why) and after a while it returns. I will open another issue if I cannot solve it.
Offline
Good to read you were able to resolve your issue from my slightly chain of thought post.
When you say your wifi connection fails and the returns after some time, you presumably mean it returns in the sense of the connection coming back, not in the sense of some process finishing, which is more common in these circles. My new 802.11n wifi stick sometimes falls over, but I've not noticed it coming back yet, I've usually restarted it already with a 'sudo netctl restart <interface>' already, although if you're using networkmanager presumably you'll need to use that somehow instead. I tend to think it's probably a hardware issue, or possibly a driver issue, but either way not something the good people of this parish can fix themselves.
Architecture: pentium4, Testing repos: Yes, Hardware: EeePC 901+2GB RAM+OS half on the SD card.
Offline
Yes, I mean that the connection is broken and reconnect after a while. When I do
$ ping 8.8.8.8Sometimes some packages are lost or sometimes 100% are lost and usually when I start graphical mode or sometimes in console mode, it lost connection and returns
192.168.1.129 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable
192.168.1.129 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable
192.168.1.129 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable
192.168.1.129 icmp_seq=4 Destination Host Unreachable
192.168.1.129 icmp_seq=5 Destination Host Unreachable
192.168.1.129 icmp_seq=6 Destination Host UnreachableI downloaded archlinux32 from January last year and boot from usb (I'm sure that it worked) to check if I have the same issue and I have the issue (some packets are lost), so I think that could be that wifi card fails.
Offline
I solved today the issue.
I made a mistake selecting a specifing channel in router's settings. At that moment was the faster channel.
Today I selected channel auto in router's settings and now it works fine.
Offline