bugtracker now online

deep42thought · 2017-11-07 10:43:54

Hi,
a big thanks goes to tyzoid for setting up a bugtracker!
So please, from now on, report bugs of packages there. Nevertheless, this forum should (still) be used for discussion(s) on packages.

Also note, that the build-master checks the bug list on the bug tracker for some actions.
Most notably, package-x won't be moved from testing to stable if there is an unresolved bug in category "Packages: Testing" with "[package-x]" in the title.

cheers,
deep42thought

andreas_baumann · 2017-11-07 10:53:49

Registered, I don't seem to have the right though to add a new bug. :-)

deep42thought · 2017-11-07 10:58:35

You're now a "reporter" - does that help?

ah, ok. The email notification does not work yet, so tyzoid enabled manual registration (e.g. an admin needs to approve your registration).

andreas_baumann · 2017-11-07 10:59:23

Yes. This helps. I can add a bug now.

andreas_baumann · 2017-11-07 11:00:39

Question: the package names has to appear in the summary of the bug? As on Archlinux [ffmpeg] or should we invent a convention here?

deep42thought · 2017-11-07 11:02:58

The package name needs to be in the title and encapsulated in square brackets. That's right. I thought, this was the convention upstream, too?

deep42thought · 2017-11-07 11:04:09

as an example: FS#2

andreas_baumann · 2017-11-07 11:05:32

Ok. Perfect.

andreas_baumann · 2017-11-07 11:07:10

I hope there will not be a confusion here: in the list of blocked packages we use FS#xxxx to reference bugs upstreams.
Now we get colliding flyspray number for our own bugreporting tool.
Should we have a FS#4444 and FS32#4444 for the blocking emails?

deep42thought · 2017-11-07 11:14:52

that's exactly, what I told the build-master scripts :-)
It recognizes FS32#$number

andreas_baumann · 2017-11-07 11:17:15

Ah. Cool. :-)

andreas_baumann · 2017-11-07 11:17:35

I'm filling in some already known bugs..

deep42thought · 2017-11-07 11:18:01

ok, thanks - but use the subcategories, please

andreas_baumann · 2017-11-07 11:22:09

Oups, maybe I need more rights, I cannot change them now..

andreas_baumann · 2017-11-07 11:26:48

Thanks. :-)

deep42thought · 2017-11-07 11:27:14

Maybe, there are too many different user groups anyway (who needs "basic"?)

andreas_baumann · 2017-11-09 09:37:37

Some questions:
- Should we theme the bug tracker in the Archlinux way? Is there an easy way to do it?
- What happens with i686 bugs over on http://bugs.archlinux.org? Will they be simply deleted?
Or can they be exported from that instance and be reimported into our bug tracking? Would
be a shame to loose known bugs concering 32-bit issues..

deep42thought · 2017-11-09 22:27:17

also see what guys said in the irc-log

jonathon · 2018-01-10 23:02:48

deep42thought wrote:

You're now a "reporter" - does that help?
ah, ok. The email notification does not work yet, so tyzoid enabled manual registration (e.g. an admin needs to approve your registration).

Do new accounts still need both email and admin activation?

deep42thought · 2018-01-11 06:36:48

I'm not sure about that. As I read it, you can register w/o admin interaction, but we still need to promote you to "reporter", so you can actually open a bug report (which I've done now).

jonathon · 2018-01-11 21:24:51

Thank you.

I wonder if it's worth making people "reporter" by default... why would people sign up to the bug tracker if not to report a bug?

deep42thought · 2018-01-12 07:06:45

to spam? At least, that's what bots do in the forums. But anyway, I haven't seen one bot on the bugtracker registering yet ...

Arch Linux

#1 2017-11-07 10:43:54

bugtracker now online

#2 2017-11-07 10:53:49

Re: bugtracker now online

#3 2017-11-07 10:58:35

Re: bugtracker now online

#4 2017-11-07 10:59:23

Re: bugtracker now online

#5 2017-11-07 11:00:39

Re: bugtracker now online

#6 2017-11-07 11:02:58

Re: bugtracker now online

#7 2017-11-07 11:04:09

Re: bugtracker now online

#8 2017-11-07 11:05:32

Re: bugtracker now online

#9 2017-11-07 11:07:10

Re: bugtracker now online

#10 2017-11-07 11:14:52

Re: bugtracker now online

#11 2017-11-07 11:17:15

Re: bugtracker now online

#12 2017-11-07 11:17:35

Re: bugtracker now online

#13 2017-11-07 11:18:01

Re: bugtracker now online

#14 2017-11-07 11:22:09

Re: bugtracker now online

#15 2017-11-07 11:26:48

Re: bugtracker now online

#16 2017-11-07 11:27:14

Re: bugtracker now online

#17 2017-11-09 09:37:37

Re: bugtracker now online

#18 2017-11-09 22:27:17

Re: bugtracker now online

#19 2018-01-10 23:02:48

Re: bugtracker now online

#20 2018-01-11 06:36:48

Re: bugtracker now online

#21 2018-01-11 21:24:51

Re: bugtracker now online

#22 2018-01-12 07:06:45

Re: bugtracker now online

Board footer